Elections and absenteeism
Nor is it acceptable that less than 30% of eligible voters to decide, reaching the relative majority, who should administer and govern the entire population.
E 'absolutely necessary to amend the election laws, setting a very high quorum, at least 80% of those entitled to vote, showing that the vote valid.
If the quorum is not reached, the vote should be declared null and should be automatically elected candidates "independent" (ie not belonging to either the deployment of the "Majority" or to that of the 'Opposition ") most voted.
course, the electoral lists, to be held valid, should provide a sufficient number of candidates "independent" and to that end, both the majority and the Opposition, should ensure their chosen include where there were not enough.
With these reforms, there should be a high voter turnout, such that the very least, to decide the fate of the country is at least 40% of those eligible, as all those who were satisfied with the conduct of the "what" public , would have an interest to confirm the administrators and leaders in charge and, simultaneously, to prevent them from being elected to strangers "independent" for lack of quorum.
other hand, those who were dissatisfied, also would like to prevent that - for lack of quorum - were the "independent" to come to power and, at the same time try to send me their nominations.
In essence that is, whether voters who identify with the majority that those who recognize themselves in the minority, with the certainty that in the absence of a quorum, they would lose the election, would all be encouraged to vote.
They then add the votes of all the undecided between one or the other camp, who would choose the "independents" and the votes of all those who would choose them instead for a reason.
Another significant aid to achieving a high participation in elections, would certainly be given by electronic voting, which it is hoped by the time enforcement, including dramatically reduce card fraud and void.
0 comments:
Post a Comment